In September 2009 I wrote a post about learning the roots of the 2008 Financial Crisis. It really gets to the crux of why I was compelled to go on somewhat of an economic “expedition” to find out what went wrong with the U.S. economic system in 2008. Prior to the crisis there I wasn’t aware of any body of economic work that intelligently outlined the causes (not just the symptoms) of the financial crisis than the Austrian School of Economics. As I’ve said in earlier posts, I truly believe that the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) is by far one of the most complete descriptions of the “science”, if you will, of economic booms and busts. In addition to the ABCT, I believe that the Austrians have a way of interweaving a healthy amount of skepticism when it relates to the government intervening in the broader economy.

Unfortunately many other economic disciplines make wild assumptions, often very overly optimistic assumptions about the value of government intervention. At the same time, I have my own skepticism on the benefits of a 100% Libertarian approach to our social and political problems, but they clearly have the right pulse on many of the causes of how financial markets and economic incentives can be distorted by “well intentioned” governments. Private corporations don’t get off the hook, but in the context of the financial crisis, they worked in tandem with the government to completely destroy the economy.

I want to make a couple of points:

1. Be an economic policy skeptic. All policy isn’t created equal. As a matter of fact, many of the policy “prescriptions” by the government were completely backward and financially destructive and/or these policies were instituted to benefit a few while impoverishing many.
2. Read some of the suggested resources below. As a matter fact, read as much economic policy as you can. Many times you’ll get to the “real” intentions behind a lot of these policies.
3. Your Congress is bought (Thank you Dylan Ratigan from MSNBC). Please watch the video below and make sure you listen to every single word. If it’s not clear after you watch this video that voting for these cronies is a waste of time, then just off yourself. Okay..that was a joke..don’t off yourself but really understand that depending on our “do nothing” Congress is a waste of time.
4. The only option left is civil disobedience. What I like to call “soft” anarchy. Be an active participant in the economy. Vote with your pocket. Our government was not always enslaved to corporate interests. This can be undone, but it’s going to take a lot more than marching, waving hands, and holding creatively snark protest signs in different cities. There’s trillions of dollars at stake and if a high level of creative destruction doesn’t take place by the people, then we are playing a very dangerous, albeit participatory charade of musical “armchair revolutionary” chairs. Instead of sitting at home or in a cafe we are sitting in the streets.

Books

• Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That Is Breaking America by Matt Taibbi
• Greedy Bastards: How We Can Stop Corporate Communists, Banksters, and Other Vampires from Sucking America Dry by Dylan Ratigan
• Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt
• Road to Serfdom by F.A. Hayek
• The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 by Paul Krugman
• America’s Great Depression by Murray N. Rothbard
• Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse by Thomas E. Woods Jr. and Ron Paul

(AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

At the root of every social movement is the will to change the present situation for something better. At the root of the Occupy Wall Street protest, which has now moved to other cities around the country, the intention of this movement is to unhook the almost parasitical tentacles of Wall Street from government policy (Washington). More on this here

I don’t believe ANY significant changes will happen via government policy or Washington’s intervention. Washington is an entity that is in the last stages of terminal “political” cancer. At the end of the day, this has to result in the banking firms that were responsible for this crisis to be reprimanded for their corporate malfeasance. We should reward (with our business) those financial institutions that are fiscally responsible, and move our money out of those financial institutions that contributed to the financial crisis.

I’m not convinced that the TBTF banks really understand what they did, nor does our government really care to prosecute these banks who irresponsibly unhinged the global economy for their narrow benefit.

So what we truly need to occupy, is our apathy. It’s our apathy and reluctance to being properly engaged in our political process that has contributed to Wall Street usurping power from the laymen and laywomen. In short, we kept our eye off the ball for too long. This corporate takeover has been happening for decades. Some would say it’s been happening since the inception of the Federal Reserve Bank. Regardless of when you think international banks started unsettling our political process, we are clearly at a tipping point where banks have complete control over our political process.

My suggestion is we engage in a bit of creative destruction to bring the balance of power back into the hands of where it belongs. the Proletariat and many of the hard working people of America (and around the world) who watched their jobs, wealth, financial security and personal livelihood go up in flames by the Wall Street, Federal Reserve Bank, Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) doomsday machine.

We should start with the following approach:

1. Remove all your assets and loans (checking, savings, IRA, Mutual funds, Brokerage accounts, credit cards, car loans, mortgages, etc) from all banks that were given a bailout from the government.
2. Take all those assets/loans and transfer them to a credit union or firm that was not given a bailout.
3. Everyone who did the first 2 steps should draft a personal letter using their own words and explain to the banks/investment firms (who no longer have your business) why you removed all your money. In addition to that, explain why you moved your assets to the other bank/investment firm.

It’s time to transform our thoughts into action. Show these banks and our “absentee landlord” government that they cannot push our society to the edge of financial oblivion, while profiting off that same financial destruction.

A bank is a place that will lend you money if you can prove that you don’t need it. – Bob Hope

Related Links

This post was inspired by Langton Hughes’s A Dream Deferred.

Rather than go through the typical romanticization of our founders on July 4th while gushing over the 1st Amendment like a first born son, I’m going to write about some of the pressing issues of an America that has broken it’s promise with it’s citizens. Some contemporary patriots might scoff at me for suggesting such a thing, but my audience are for those who have been left behind, and not those how have fortunately benefited from the American fruits of liberty. Contrary to popular belief, everyone has not reached the promise land. Let me be careful with that last line. I’m not suggesting we start helicoptering pallets of money down to the masses. I’m suggesting that upward mobility is becoming more elusive and contrary to popular belief America does not have more mobility than other nations. In fact it has one of the lowest.

Some might say I’m being too hard on America and I should tone the “anti-patriotic” language down. When your country is at Defcon 1 in regards to social and economic issues, you have to ring the alarm to let everyone know that that we have a 10 alarm fire. Why should I save “patriotic” face when we are not living up to what this country has promised since the ratification of the Constitution? I see America as a country that is slowly losing it’s way. We hear a lot of lofty speeches from politicians, but when the citizens are asked to make hard choices we fall back to our ideological political camps.

Below you’ll find a video that is extremely telling in regards to the current economic shift that is happening globally. James Wolfensohn, former president of The World Bank and CEO of Wolfensohn and Co. does an eye-opening presentation for Stanford Graduate School of Business students on the coming global economic shift. In short, America and some of it’s Western compatriots are running out of time. It has debt to it’s eyeballs and waning political leverage on the global stage. It has financial obligations (Healthcare, Social Security, etc) that’s depressing it’s ability to leverage it’s internal resources. China, India, Africa and many other GCC countries are gobbling up global GDP faster than the cookie monster disintegrates cookies. If that wasn’t bad enough, we have a populace that does not have the 21st century education and skills needed to complete on a global scale.

Without further ado I give you James Wolfensohn, who asserts that in the next 40 years, a global power shift will see today’s leading economic countries drop from having 80% of the world’s income to 35%.

• Documentary: Citizen U.S.A.: A 50 State Road Trip
• Half of Americans say that they definitely or probably couldn’t come up with $2,000 in 30 days
• Van Jones Launches Movement To Rebuild The American Dream
• Think Again: American Decline by Gideon Rachman
• Busts Keep Getting Bigger and Bigger. Why? by Paul Krugman and Robin Wells

I’ve spent the last couple weeks cruising through the documentary Collapse on my IPhone. The documentary is on Michael Ruppert, a police officer turned independent reporter who predicted the current financial crisis in his self-published newsletter, From the Wilderness.

There is some pretty scary stuff in Collapse. Mr. Ruppert goes way beyond just fractional reserve banking, fiat currency and Federal Reserve monetary policy, but spends a substantial amount of time on the potential societal impacts for the human population because there are limited resources on planet earth.

This documentary serves more of reality check than another boilerplate conspiracy theory piece. As Mr. Ruppert so eloquently stated:

Of course I’ve been called a conspiracy theorist but I don’t deal in conspiracy theory, I deal with conspiracy fact

The audio above is by far some of the truest and honest reality check I’ve heard since Alan Moore’s Culture of Steam quote regarding the doubling of information.

Another other choice quote from the documentary so you know what we are dealing with:

If your in a camp with a bunch of campers, and a bear attacks, you don’t have to be faster than the bear. You only have to be faster than the slowest camper. – Michael C. Ruppert

Now that the 2010 midterm elections are over, all you have to do is view the NYTimes word train from both parties to see the growing dividing line between Democrats and Republicans. 2010 midterm word train vs 2008 election word train. The fault line between red and blue states is deepening. More polarization of ideas equals more congressional gridlock while getting less and less done for the country.

My mood is disappointed. Not because the Republicans gained more seats in the House and flipped several seats in the Senate. Not because the Dems got a licking because there are no jobs. Not because because some of the most extreme ideologues are now representatives in the U.S. government. Not because the youth and other Black/Latino voters decided to stay home during this midterm election. Not because the Independents were “fair weather friends” of the 2008 election that ushered in Democrat control of the House/Senate including the Obama Administration and have now “turncoat” in less than half a presidential term. This is not a “sour grapes” reaction, this is a “reality grapes” reaction.

I’m disappointed because the American people, yet again, have an extremely short memory and seemed to have absolved the Republican party of decades of policy incompetence. They have never been the party of small government, free enterprise, fiscal discipline and just because they say it a thousand times, doesn’t mean that this is the answer or that they should institute these policies that they espouse. We don’t need small government, we need a smart and accountable government. We not only need a policy that encourages free enterprise, but a ethical free enterprise system. I’m not convinced that any party, Democrat or Republican or the fringe Republican movement known as the Tea Party, have the vision or ideas that will lead to the needed policy changes that will pull America out of this economic funk.

It’s not JUST spending cuts, it’s what you cut, it’s not JUST tax cuts, it’s balanced tax cuts that benefit the whole and not JUST the rich, it’s not JUST small business that matters, but the working poor that need help too. The single most crushing reality of this situation is ideological rhetoric has trumped informed reality. Fiscal fantasy over fiscal discipline. The American people nor our congressional representatives are prepared to make the radical changes to fix our problems. The rapid “zig zag” movements between parties is a testament to this fact. The achilles heel of this political process is we do not have an objective citizenry (regardless of the left or right), that has the information needed to understand the difference between sound policy decisions that benefit the whole vs corporatist ideologues posing as honest politicians who pretend that they are offering sound policy decisions.

Understanding the hows, whys, and whats of domestic and foreign policy is difficult. To be honest, I spend a considerable amount of time probing for facts and I STILL don’t have a crystal clear understanding of this stuff . It’s probably why most people prefer 30 second sound bites that move them into certain ideological political circles than doing the grudging hard work of researching and objectively interrogating certain policy ideas. It’s easy to follow your emotions, while not challenging the status quo. People are constantly asking “Where are the JOBS?”. For you to understand this, you have to go back several presidential administrations to understand how we got here. It didn’t start with the Bush Sr. Administration or Clinton Administration although they exacerbated the problem and it most certainly didn’t start with the GW Bush Administration although they exacerbated the problem. And to think the Obama Administration was a prerequisite to this current fiscal crisis is absolutely ludicrous. You have to research all the fiscal policy decisions starting around the Marquette Decision (1978) which completely deregulated the credit card industry. If the so-called “big bang” was the beginning of the universe, then the Marquette Decision was the big bang for our future fiscal problems. Our current “jobless recovery” is a host of bad policy decisions (including Fed policy) that was institutionalized for last 30 years.

Pointing a finger at any one political party is a waste of time. For what it’s worth, the one single book that has given me more food for thought on the nature of regulatory reform, fiscal policy decisions by the U.S. government, global monetization policy, Fed monetary policy and the roots of economic booms and busts including our current fiscal crisis is the book Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy by Raghuram Rajan. You can also read Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism by Kevin Phillips which helps to understand these fiscal issues too. Start there and use this as a guide so you can understand why jobs have been obliterated from the U.S economy. In short, our extreme financialization of phantom assets/equity, erroneous reactions from the Fed have severely hampered the U.S. economy, not to mention financial illiteracy by the general public. It’s not going to take half of a presidential term to get out of this. We are 3-4 presidential terms away from getting even close to fixing the fundamentals of the U.S. economy. If that. Jobs can only come from the efficient use of resources in the economy. I repeat, there is no political party that can get us out of this. Once we realize that we are all in this together, irrespective of party affiliation, things will start falling into place.

Books

• Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy by Raghuram Rajan
• Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism by Kevin Phillips

Recently I’ve been reading a lot of articles on the housing market and how it’s been impacted by macro economic policy of the U.S. One article that stands out to clear the air on the roots of inflation and it’s so-called “archenemisis” deflation is Frank Shostak’s Is Deflation Really Bad for the Economy.

I spend a lot of time on mises.org. Not because all my ideas on economics fall in the so-called “Libertarian” camp, although I find many of my own views inline with many Libertarian views, but I can get straight non-partisan, non-baised information on what makes the global economy tick from the likes of mises.org.

It’s not for lack of trying to understand the “conventional” mainstream economic wisdom, but at some point you have to let go and look for greener pastures of understanding. So as we all know, the source of our economic woes was a huge bubble in real estate, prices soared beyond their intrinsic value, investors hedged their bets on those inflated prices and when the cheap credit and cash ran out, prices corrected themselves and we are now experiencing a dramatic price correction in the economy. Unfortunately we are experiencing a huge price correction on all areas of the economy because the real estate industry doesn’t happen in a vacuum. There are many industries that are tethered to real estate, so if real estate gets the “financial flu”, everyone else is going to get “financial pneumonia”.

As stated in the title of Shostaks’ article, “Is Deflation Really Bad for the Economy?”. Well..in the case of the U.S economy yes and no, but overall…No. It’s going to be bad for those individuals who were apart of those jobs in industries that experienced “bubble” prices. Meaning those prices weren’t real and any macroeconomic attempt by the Fed to prop up those inflated prices is a recipe for disaster. The prudent way to go is getting an asset back to it’s “real” price and not the fake “bubble” price. You can’t build off of something that was never supposed to be there in the first place. The “Great Recession” that you are seeing in the U.S. and other economies is a price correction. If there are pockets in the economy that are experiencing a value/price correction, then this is a good thing.

How is any economy going to experience any efficiency or proper recovery if you prop up areas of the economy that are correcting themselves? There are only x-amount of savings and investment resources in the economy and propping up “dead areas” of the economy will create artificial demand (i.e. housing) which is just another bubble. A bubble is just a misuse of resources, not something that is healthy for any economy.

I’ll close with Thomas Wood’s wonderful analogy from his book Meltdown: A Free Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse. No better explanation can sum up the danger that lies ahead if we continue to artificially maintain areas of the economy that deserve a value correction:

Consider a circus that comes to town for a few weeks. A restaurant owner may expand his seating capacity in the false expectation that the circus and the related demand for his food that it brings in its wake will last forever. But when the circus leaves town, he’ll find he has “idle resources” on his hands. We should not want to put these idle resources to work. Doing so would only draw labor and other resources away from other sectors of the economy, where they are employed in the satisfaction of real consumer demand. The expansion of the restaurant should not have occurred in the first place. We should want this bubble activity to shrink back down to size, in order that other, non-bubble activities in the economy can be correspondingly strengthened.

In the wake of a previous, unsustainable boom brought about by the central bank’s credit expansion, the market economy and its price system, left to their own devices, will adopt another arrangement of resources that employs available factors in the service of producing goods and services that correspond to real consumer demand. During the bust, free individuals interacting within the market nexus sort out which projects and business ventures are healthy and sustainable, and which are bubble activities that cannot survive without a constant artificial increase in the money supply, and cannot (and should not) survive now that reality has reasserted itself.

• Tooth Fairy Economics by Thomas Woods
• Our Insane System of mortgage finance? by John Papola
• The Fed Can’t Solve Our Economic Woes by Gerald P O’Driscoll Jr.
• Is Deflation Really Bad for the Economy? by Frank Shostak

That’s right, I don’t own a flat screen, I still have my old school 27” RCA Remote Monitor ColorTrak (Picture embedded in the post) that came with the Co-op when I bought it almost 4 years ago. It never went bad, so I never replaced it. Until that day comes, I’m rocking the RCA 27” till the tube explodes like a spark from those old school cameras that used flash powder (aluminum and potassium perchlorate) to light up the pictures. Unfortunately this post is not about my electronic frugality, but close to the topic at hand. Last night my wife and I attended Poetic, People and Power 8th annual show Price Check: How We Became a Culture of Consumption. Here’s a bio from the website:

Poetic People Power was founded by writer/performance poet Tara Bracco in 2003 to create an ongoing project that combines poetry and activism. Each year, a diverse group of poets are commissioned to write new works on a political or social issue. The new poems are then brought to a public audience in April to celebrate National Poetry Month. Poetic People Power entertains and informs. It raises awareness on specific topics and engages audiences through the expressive art of poetry.

Right now it’s 6:52am, and I’m postponing my P90x routine this morning to write about this, because I was so moved by the poet(s) poetry. This particular show was about the power of consumerism and how our society has become somewhat enslaved to an ideology of spending and debt. I touched on this topic in a post I wrote in 2006 called Slave to Fashion Dominatrix to Prices. This is not just about people who overspend, it’s also about the cost of living (healthcare, education, etc) skyrocketing and how wages have stagnated (relative to inflation), while pushing many of us further into debt.

In light of the recent financial crisis, this is extremely important. I cannot find the exact words to explain how last night’s topic is connected to the happiness and financial solvency of the average household, but I’ll leave you with this.

In the foreward of Tim Kasser’s book The High Price of Materialism, Richard M. Ryan summarizes Kasser’s research by stating.

Once people are above poverty levels of income, gains in wealth have little to no incremental payoff in terms of happiness and well-being.

Also check out this very eye opening and disturbing documentary on how our kids are becoming indoctrinated by a new culture of consumerism. I have 1 year old so for those parents out there, keep your third eye open.

Get informed, Get Active, and Become a smarter consumer!. There are resources below for those who are interested:

• Affluenza: The All-Consuming Epidemic ~ John de Graaf (Author), David Wann (Author), Thomas H Naylor (Author), David Horsey (Illustrator), Vicki Robin
• The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don’t Need ~ Juliet B. Schor
• The Hight Price of Materialism by Tim Kasser
• Credit Card Nation by Robert D. Manning
• The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less by Barry Schwartz
• Your Money or Your Life by Vicki Robin & Joe Dominquez
• No Logo by Naomi Klein

1. Part I: Renting vs Buying a home
2. Part II: Why Can’t I Make Ends Meet?
   (How I found the Austrian School of Economics)
3. Part III: Saving Money vs Serfdom
4. Part IV: Casino Capitalism

Shout out to Br. Halit for giving me the title for this post, originally titled The Case for NO Interest. I am no Islamic scholar or fancy economist. I’m a student of Islam and life. Although I don’t have the vast econ-textbook knowledge like many official economist, by the good graces of Allah, I do have common sense and a pragmatic mind. With all the thousands of economist around the world, only a few of them had the insight to foresee the recent 2008 financial crisis, not to mention past crises. Doesn’t mean that we don’t need economists, but I see a lot rear-view/hindsight economists out there. I wrote this post due to my interest, no pun intended, in understanding the Islamic law regarding the prohibition of Riba (interest). Many of the themes of this post are related to Islam. If you have a problem with that and topics that have to do with Allah (God) make you too uncomfortable, then you should go here:

Table of Contents

1. Allah’s (God) ruling on Interest
2. I’m NOT Interested
3. Economic Sophistry
4. A Fair Alternative to Interest
5. Conclusion

Allah’s (God) ruling on Interest

The purpose of this post is a conversational starter on the questionable merits of interest. In addition I’m doing a bit of education here for non-Muslims because they ask me question after question after I tell them that interest is prohibited in Islam. I will address some of their questions in this post. Regardless of your way of life, clearly there is room for discussion on abolishing interest based transactions. From an Islamic perspective, Riba (Interest) is prohibited. Taking interest or charging interest is prohibited. A transaction can be prohibited by adding money on top of money (giving or taking) or by overpricing assets that are sold to the public. In Islam, every financial action should be just. You can profit, but not at the gross expense of others. The whole point of Islamic finance is to create a proper balance between the basic needs of society and the profitability of those business transactions that impact that society. In today’s world of secular based ideology, a person in power can justify any act through legal sophistry, even if the act undermines the person and the surrounding community. In Islam, you don’t “Rob Peter to Pay Paul“, then wrap an act or law in some fancy legalese, while ignoring the financial imbalances and “moral hazard” that is inserted into the economic system.

In my view, this is the root of the problem. As long as their are lawyers, financiers, investors, and government regulators that can justify questionable financial acts with legal and economic sophistry, we could have continued systemic problems. It’s not just Islam that prohibits usury (interest), but every monotheistic religion has prohibited usury. Over time, with re-writing and revisions of theological law, the use of usury has been used as an acceptable mechanism for profit. Allah knows best, but I do believe that interest is 1 head of a 5 headed demon of what is wrong with the economy. In addition to interest, clearly we are suffering from a ethical problem, financial illiteracy problem, debt burden problem, regulatory reform problem and definitely a hubris problem.

I’m NOT interested

When I get into discussions on economics and Islam, while making it clear that Islam does NOT allow interest based transactions, many people ask “Well how do you make any money in Islam?”. That would be like me saying “Hey I don’t drink alcohol”. Then they ask me, “Well how do you quench your thirst”?

I find it strange that the same people who say “Hey, let the free and fair market take it’s due course”, are the same people that aren’t as excited to deal with the burden of all that “free market” activity when the economy collapses. I like to call these people “Fair Weather Market/Economy Capitalists”. All the interest in the world couldn’t even save two major investment firms in 2008, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. What about AIG? Those are just the more recent victims and had other firms not been bailed out, many more would have gone under. Remember Long Term Capital Management in the 1990s? I thought interest was supposed to account for risk over time? Uh, what happened?

What is so interesting is if you talk to the so-called “interest specialists” about interest they will give you some economic sophistry on how interest is needed for true capitalism or interest is not responsible for our economic missteps. Being that interest is so tightly coupled to our economy how could anyone believe that interest isn’t part of the problem when many of the 140 financial crises we’ve had since 1978 had to do with debt or interest rates. Many times they will quote me some “classical theory of interest-esque or time preference theory” response or something similar to the Wiki definition below:

Definition

Compound interest is very similar to simple interest; however, with time, the difference becomes considerably larger. This difference is because unpaid interest is added to the balance due. Put another way, the borrower is charged interest on previous interest.

Did you folks just get what I just typed? Lets also keep in mind that these are “THEORIES“, not laws. Charging interest on previous interest. And this is what we call an equitable transaction? Says who? The gatekeepers of the economy? Or I should earn a return on money that I have not earned? I guess the supermarket should charge me double the “regular” price of milk because they built the supermarket, bought the trucks to deliver the milk, hired people to put the milk on the shelves, etc.

The typical response:

You see that’s how it works. It’s absurd to think that someone shouldn’t pay for money over time. Look, the consensus is clear, we smart people say so, and we have the theories (not laws) and dusty economic books to prove that interest is needed for capital markets, so get over it. Don’t let me quote Jeremy Bentham.

Absurd huh? I guess as long as we are using text book definitions, here is the text book definition of alcohol (Ethanol):

Any of a series of hydroxyl compounds, the simplest of which are derived from saturated hydrocarbons, have the general formula CnH2n+1OH, and include ethanol and methanol.

“Of course, there is nothing in that definition that seems harmful, right?” Just a bunch of hydroxyls and hydrocarbon atoms doing the bounding “two step”.

Lets just ignore the amount of murders, car accidents,alcoholism, addiction, rapes, drug abuse, broken families, bankruptcies, domestic violence, financial cost to the health care system, human cost to livelihood, brain damage, etc that this psychoactive drug contributes to and all is well. Nothing but a lipstick on a pig. As long as we dress it up with sophisticated language and words that only phds and so called “economists” can understand, we should be happy to deal with interest in the economy.

Economic Sophistry

What is even more perplexing, is you’ll have pro-interest individuals stating, “Hey, without interest we wouldn’t have the proper growth in the global economy” Really? Do these individuals realize how many times governments and monarchies around the world since the French Revolution have literally printed themselves out of an economic crisis (yes printing money out of thin air) while debasing the currency and sending inflation through the roof? [See A Free Nation Deep in Debt by James McDonald] Is this what free and fair market is? Whenever I get into deep trouble just print more money to fix the problem and still call the system a free and fair market? Fractional Reserve banking? We arbitrarily choose who the winners and losers (bailouts) are in the economy and then call it a “free and fair” market? Is this not hubris?

I’m curious what the economies around the world would look like if money wasn’t printed out of thin air to “fix” the economy? Oh, no problem, well just have deficits that we will never ever pay back. Can you imagine an American citizen telling the IRS, “Oh hey don’t worry about my debt, that is just a deficit and I’ll just carry it over for the remainder of my life while printing up money from my house to pay for new bills. See, I fixed the problem”. And this is what they call a “free and fair” market? With that being said I am not for the printing of money because this is just another form of interest, not to mention it is a economically flawed approach to monetary policy. With all the interest that is being charged, none of it was enough to account for risk over time. The current crisis is yet another indicator that the same Wall Street titans that profit off of interest based financial instruments are nothing but “welfare” corporations who got done in by the same interest they charged. In fancy econ-world talk they call this “over-leveraged”. This is just another word for “Hey I can’t pay this loan back with interest”. Every major bank/investment firm was almost insolvent, if not insolvent in 2008. You name it, Citibank, Lehman, UBS etc, and some banks like Washington Mutual have been banished to bankruptcy land, never to be seen again.

As Nassim Taleb states in Black Swan regarding the Savings and Loan Crisis:

The same happened in 1983 with money center banks losing cumulatively every penny ever made, and in 1991-1992 when the Savings and Loans industry became history.

Take a look at the “free and fair” market looks like with bailout after bailout since the 1970s:
http://www.propublica.org/special/government-bailouts

So what happened banks and investment firms? Wasn’t interest and your high returning investments supposed to dig you out of the hole when financial disruptions strike? Apparently not. So if interest is not even a mechanism that can properly account for risk over time, then why are we doing it in the first place? Don’t be fooled by the fancy language, “Re-capitalize” is just another fancy word for “Corporate Wic Check”. Instead of food, the tax payers are buying toxic assets. I would use the term “buying” lightly. “Off-Balance Sheet” has now become another word for “hiding risky assets that I know would completely deteriorate my companies net worth and possibly make my company insolvent”.

Fictitious Banker Convo:

Banker: Uh Mr. Oxford I noticed that you had 40K in credit card debt. I think this is going to be a problem with getting you that loan.
Me: Oh no problem, you see you actually weren’t supposed to see that. I have this thing called “off balanced sheet” which hides that 40K debt so my balance sheet looks better than it is.
Banker: Hmm, okay that makes sense, why would I want to get an accurate representation of the risk. That just preposterous. Ha ha ha (laughs nervously)
Me: Exactly, I kind of felt the same way, so can I get a “do over”?
Banker: Sure. You are approved.

The stalwart supporters of this farce economy are like the following story:
Let’s say a bunch of engineers (Bankers and Investment Firms) create a recycling water cleansing system (RWCS). They say that as long as you have 800,000 liters of water (cash) in the system, the system can maintain itself. Whatever run off (bad investments) and natural evaporation (risk) that happens will be replenished by natural rain fall (interest and fractional reserve banking) and the efficiency of the system extracting more water out of the system (profitable investments). Then over time, instead of 800,000 plus liters of water in the system, the amount decreases by 50,000 liters every 3 months. By year 3 the water system is struggling with only 200,000 liters. Even with natural rain fall subsidizing the system, they still can’t cut it. Now instead of admitting that the recycling water cleansing system is not working, the engineers siphon water from the Atlantic Ocean (Bailouts and printed money) into the RWCS to artificially bring back the system up to 800,000 liters of water while patting themselves on the back and stating “Hey look, our system works. All we need is the occasional water subsidy and we are in business”.

What a sad state of affairs. Are we so blind?

A Fair Alternative to Interest

Some might read this and think I’m some wacko dogmatic socialist. As if creating a profit mechanism that is an alternative to interest based profit makes you a socialist. Ha! I’m no “Capitalist” which means my motivation in life is not just profit. When I do business, I’m for making a profit but not at the expense of what Allah has intelligently decreed for society at large. In addition, equality and being just is more important than mere profit, and it’s not like that ideology has served ALL of society well, considering the current circumstances. A title I’ll steal from John Kim which is a Capital Anarchy. This is what we are dealing with in the 21st century. Many people outside of Islam might believe that people who believe in following the guidelines of Quran and the Shariah of Allah (SWT) are bunch of mindless drones that don’t actually reflect and ponder on those same rulings with proper intellect. This is far from the truth. When I found out that usury (interest) was prohibited in Islam, I spent a substantial amount of time researching the law and the mathematics behind the prohibition. Not to mention, that are many Islamic scholars who can elaborate even beyond my amateur approach to explains Riba and it’s consequences to the global economy. If you are interested in thinking outside of the box, hit me up on Facebook and I’ll give you the sources. There are some sources below too.

As I said earlier, there are lawful ways to profit that don’t involve interest. I’ll use the example of buying a house, which is a business transaction that most people can relate to. I touched on the Islamic Financing option in my the First Part of Economics Made Simple Renting vs Buying a Home.

As you can see the transaction is a equitable one that balances the risk. Each party owns their fair share of the investment, which brings me to my next point of Profit-Sharing also know as Mudarabah. You can read about more Islamic Financing options from here. There over 8 different options and all of these options cover various financing needs, whether a line of credit is needed, financing of large purchase items like a house, etc.

I don’t see how one of the main approaches from various venture capital firms is something that cannot be utilized in more areas of finance. If profit sharing was so inefficient why do multi-million dollar VC companies exist? Why don’t they charge interest on the money they lent you? It’s simple, what ever you put in is what ever you get out of the investment. If you own 25% of the investment you get 25% of the ROI (Return on Investment). If you own 66.6823% of the investment you get 66.6823% of the ROI. What is also very beneficial with this model is it allows people with smaller amounts of liquidity to get in on the ground floor of a particular investment. Very similar to how a fractional shares work.

Check this out:
Just imagine that a supermarket wanted to move into your neighborhood. Instead of going to a bank with interest, the locals of the community can become investors too. So the total start-up cost for the supermarket, let’s call it GroceryMart, Inc need 20 million dollars. The company has the first 10 million. So they go to an Islamic bank for the 7 million and that Bank now own 35% and the rest of the 3 million is financed by the local community giving them 15% of the business. If anyone wants to offload their shares, you find another buyer or negotiate with GroceryMart.

As income streams into the business, money is equally distributed based on the percentage of ownership or other contractually negotiated payment schedule. In the contract it is stipulated that at any point in time GroceryMart can put in a bid to buy out shares of the other share holders. No different than when a company on the stock market buys back shares. Now what is great about this scenario is the risk is evenly distributed. If the business does well, we all do well and if the business does bad we all do bad. Although I mentioned the stock market example, none of these shares can be traded or bid up in price. The only way the values of the shares go up, is if the company brings in more income.

There are couple things that are accomplished with this one tactic of Islamic Finance:

1. Risk is evenly distributed based on how much you put into the business
2. There is no compounding interest that is exponentially accruing on one side of the business transaction.
3. This will actually allow people who don’t have a lot of disposable income to become investors. No different than buying fractional shares. This will greatly contribute in upping the financial literacy of the community and create a starting point for non-wealthy individuals to invest in simple straight forward businesses.
4. No more winner take all.
5. No distortion of assets from speculation and interest. Because there is no interest we don’t have wild swings in asset valuations running away from the actual value of the asset. (Very similar to what happened to the housing market in 2008)

Now some may argue that this methodology is crude or inflexible and might not maximize the highest potential for profitability. I would ask, in comparison to what? To the current so-called “free and fair” market that gets the luxury of being bailed out with printed money out of thin air whenever an economic financial crisis happens? Since the 1900s we have never had a market that did NOT have the luxury of being bailed out. In just about every instance there was never enough interest earned to properly cover the inherent risk over time. So not only do the banks and investment houses get the luxury of charging interest which is supposed to account for risk over time, but when their risked based models fail miserably the tax-payers have to bail them out. If this is a “free and fair” market, then maybe we should go back to sharecropping because this is no different.

Conclusion

I would like to reiterate that this post is a conversational starter. I would like for pro-interest individuals to watch the movie Life and Debt, or read the history of how IMF and World Bank policies have “benefited” the countries that they have done business with, or read about PayDay loans, or the 1978 Marquette Decision, or The History of the Credit Card by Frontline or any financial crisis that has happened since the 1900s. In every circumstance interest was involved which distorted the true value of assets in the market or the interest rate that banks were charging were incorrectly pegged against the assets that they were holding. In many instances, the wealth was completely wiped out be taking on loans with interest. Also keep in mind if we had let the “free and fair market’ play out, there would be way more companies going under. What we are seeing today is a fraction of bank failures due to this fiat currency/interest/fractional reserve based system artificially propping up the system.

Some might argue about savings and not getting interest. In today’s fiat based economy a dollar today is not a dollar tomorrow. The amazing part is no one every asks the big word..Why? Well, if I’m a government and I keep printing money out of thin air and dumping it all over the economy, that’s is going to lead to inflation and that milk, beans, bread or whatever is going to keep going up in price. Reserve banking (not fractional reserve banking) and stopping the demonic practice of printing money out of thin air would dramatically help in keeping prices tame. There is no reason why prices shouldn’t go down if there is not enough savings and resources in the global economy to buy everything. It’s almost impossible to know what the true price is of anything because of all this tinkering with the money supply.

In addition to this, how on earth can we trust a practice that financially punishes the most vulnerable people on the planet with higher rates of interest? Is that just? To add insult to injury now these “Credit Card Banksters” want to charge annual fees on credit cards users who don’t use their card as revolvers. What type of nonsense is this? Should we just continue this practice because the so-called financial specialist in their ivory towers say so? I would also ask those same individuals that claim to adhere to any one of the monotheistic religions to re-read their religious doctrine and put the use of usury under a microscope.

Here are some links to get you started

Bible: Kings James Bible on Usury
Torah: Judaic Ruling on Usury
Quran: Quranic Ruling on Interest

Profit sharing is class independent. It’s fair, transparent and easy to implement. With true profit-sharing, there is no distortion of the money supply (whether through interest or printing money out of thin air). For the most part, every dollar can be accounted for.

Even Warrent Buffet had to admit the following:

But Mr Buffett argues that such highly complex financial instruments are time bombs and “financial weapons of mass destruction” that could harm not only their buyers and sellers, but the whole economic system.

He gave this warning in 2003.

How much financial carnage do we have to see to understand that interest distorts markets? Are we not tired of being thrown around like a rag doll in the economy by the so-called “financial czars” and “phd interest specialists” who act like they are the gate keepers of this economy? Do you actually feel like this market is fair or you actually feel that you have economic freedom in such a distorted market?

God willing, the root to proper economic prosperity is transparency, financial equality (ethical capitalism), efficient production, fair competition which is underscored by socially responsible driven economy. These 5 principles should underscore our financial decisions and destroy the 5 demons of the economy I mentioned earlier. Not speculation, wild gyration in interest rates, and corrupt laws that protect corporate malfeasance.

If you are going to live and die by the gun of “Russian Roulette” interest, I find it quite hypocritical for the same individuals to expect the bailout ambulances to come running to their rescue.

I refuse to sit as a back seat driver and go for the ride with “financial legalese that justifies interest, which no one can understand” driving and “economic sophistry” riding shot-gun. It’s time to pull over and get out the late model White Ivory Tower EX Edition sedan.

• Why Greece Matters
  http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/02/podcast_yes_greece_could_defau.html
• Warning Against Riba Transactions
  http://abdurrahman.org/economics/ribaIbnBaz.doc
• Foreclosures Are More Profitable Than Loan Modifications, According To New Report
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/perverse-incentives-lead_n_328378.html
• How massive student loan debts are sinking American dreams and causing a national economic headache.
  http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/525/index.html
• Nassim Taleb
  http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/09/17/financial-resilience-taleb-and-mandelbrot-reflect-on-crisis/

Welcome to Part III of Economics Made Simple. I hope you have enjoyed the the first two parts of this series and if you haven’t had the moment to dig into the first two parts, the links are below.

1. Part I: Renting vs Buying a home
2. Part II: Why Can’t I Make Ends Meet?
   (How I found the Austrian School of Economics)
3. Part III: Saving Money vs Serfdom
4. Part IV: Casino Capitalism

At first I titled this post Saving vs Being an Idiot, To be honest, that title was a bit harsh, and I’m not here to demonize anyone or make them feel bad. What I really want to do is send a message that the alternative to preserving your money (AKA Saving), could potentially be a form of serfdom . Piggying-back of F.A Hayek classic book The Road to Serfdom, it’s important to understand where the road leads if we decide to treat money as if it grows on trees. So what does being a Serf or to be in Serfdom mean? Here is the definition:

A person in bondage or servitude.

Can you see where I’m going with this? Rather than bore you with a whole bunch of “savings rules”, (that most people ignore anyway), I’m going to go into a story about myself and how I went from a destroyer of money to preserver of money. Let’s begin, shall we?

Table of Contents

1. Mi av chree job (Patios to English translation: I have three jobs)
2. Syra-cash University
3. Rockbottom
4. Conclusion
5. Articles that will scare you into saving Money

Mi av chree job

So growing up in a West Indian/Jamaican family the importance of saving money or as my mother says “Saving for a Rainy Day” is one of those things that is drilled into your head as soon as you come out of the womb. I wouldn’t be surprised if my parents handed me a shovel and newborn work permit to get started at the nearest construction site. Although I jest a bit here, this ideology was one of the most important life skills that my parents gave to me. So as soon as I hit fifteen I got my work permit and started to get busy on the work grind. Very strange things start happening when you start working and you live in a Jamaican household. Similar to the parody of the Jamaican family called the Headley’s on In Living Colour, where having dozens of jobs was the joke, in real life, things aren’t so different.

No, I didn’t have 10 concurrent jobs, but I most certainly could not have 1 job. If you have 1 job in a Jamaican household, you might as well be seen as someone who is unemployed. With 2 jobs you are officially working, and with 3 jobs you are doing extra credit, if you will. So I started working at Waldbaums Supermarket in East Meadow, NY (Long Island) pushing carts. Not a very exciting job, but the $4.25 an hour was better than no dollars a hour. Right after school I would rush to do my 4:00pm to 9:30pm shift. Having 1 job was good during high school, but as the summer approaches, in probably the most natural and normal voice, my mother says “Su, wen ya start ya sekon job?” (Patios to English Translation So, when do you start your second job?”). As if that was what in the plans for my summer! Rather than dodge the question with, “What second job?”, I said “Oh, yeah..I’ll..um look around.”.

So my mother worked at EAB (European American Back) at the time, it is now Ciitbank, and I was able to get into the teller program at the bank. By the time the summer hit, I was promoted to cashier at Waldbaums, so I had a bit of experience handling money. Getting the teller job was not only a natural transition for me, but double the money I was making at Waldbaums. So I would work at the bank during the day (8am to 4pm) then rush over to Waldbaums to do my 6pm to 10pm shift. I always worked on weekends at Waldbaums and especially Sunday to get the time and a half. My weekend shift at Waldbaums started to get later and later. They needed me for the night shift, the 4pm to 11pm shift. Sometimes up until midnight. So that left a huge pocket of time during the day on weekends. Uh oh, step in mom dukes “Yu hav nuff tyme ina di day, huh?”. (Patios to English Translation: You have a lot of time in the day, huh?”. This my friends is a very passive aggressive way of saying “Hey, you have way to much time during the day, time for another job”.

So a friend of my mother, Bobby, big Italian guy that was known as “The Grape”, had a construction business. He needed help cutting down trees and busting up concrete for contract jobs around Long Island. I have no idea where Bobby is today, but let me tell you, this dude was the sweetest and nicest guy ever. He would bring fresh “muzzerallla” for my mother that was probably the best “muzzerella” I ever had. He’d buy lunch for the working crew and was just really easy going guy. Of course you had to work your behind off, but that was expected from a guy like Bobby. The job was roughly $100 bucks a day. At this point I feel like the Jamaican version of the Rothschild’s children. I had never seen or made so much money in one day. So I did a couple jobs with Bobby during the summers until it was time to go to college.

So there you have it folks, 3 jobs. I was a great saver then. I would save about 80% of my paycheck and use the rest for cds, clothes, and movies. With those jobs I was able to save about $4,000 to $5,000 dollars. That’s about $6,500 dollars in today’s dollars. Not bad. I would end up using this money for books for college, but during college I would reverse all my diligent and prudent savings practices which I will elaborate in the next section.

Syra-cash University

There is something very strange about going to college. It’s like the anticipation of going on a roller coaster for the first time. Although the anticipation of being sky-rocketed to 2-3 gs of force has you laced with fear and excitement, you can’t wait till the moment where you are at the top of the peak, and you are driven down at over 100 miles an hour down the track. Like any roller coaster with cork screws and swift roundabouts, if you are not careful you can get sick or even injure yourself. College is no different. Syracuse U. (or as I like to jokingly say Syra-cash University) was by far one of the most expensive, beneficial, and culturally diverse experiences I’ve every had in my life. Although I’m very close to paying off my school loans completely, one of the first experiences I’ll never forget is walking up on campus and seeing a row of tables with these professionally looking men and women standing before a stack of several dozen crispy white t-shirts. Before I can even blink, The nice women with the blonde hair and pearly whites says, “Sign-up for this credit card and get a FREE T-shirt”. Wow, I’ve only been on campus less than 10 minutes and I’m already getting “free” stuff. Not only do I get 10K in credit, but I get a t-shirt out it of it. Little did I know that this so-called “free” t-shirt was going to cost me almost 14K in credit card debt later on. That was the most expensive free gift anyone has given me, thanks a lot!

One of the most seductive parts of the credit card is it’s ability to fulfill the desire of instant gratification. In less than 1/100th of a second you can get whatever your heart desires. Need new shoes or clothes?, no problem, need new T.V.? no problem, need to go eat a nice restaurant? no problem, get depressed or sad and need to feel better, no problem, need to pay off the blasted credit card that got me into debt, PROBLEM. Here is a good example of what I’m talking about. There was this great little sandwich spot called Kostas. I mean, their cheesesteaks were the best. Yes, no disrespect to Philly but better than your cheesesteaks. Yes, Syracuse makes better cheesesteaks than you, get over it. However these cheesy steak subs of delight (Cheesesteak with onions, peppers, lettuce, tomato and mayo) cost me $1,000 dollars in one semester! I was to Kostas what a drug addict is to a heroin dealer. My mother called me, “Yu maad? Cyan spen dis tipe a muny an jus sanwige” (Patios to English Translation: Are you crazy?!! You can’t spend this type of money on sandwiches). Of course she was right, and there would be a host of other little subtle weekly expenses that would eventually balloon my credit card debt to 10K after I graduated from college.

After I graduated from college, my addiction to debt wasn’t getting any better. Now keep in mind that I always made the minimum payment aka share cropping payment. Like a share cropper you never ever grow or earn enough to make ends meets. All you are doing is rolling yourself into more and more debt, which was very typical of the share croppers during the 19th century. I never missed a payment, but my debt burden was not getting any smaller. Now it time to hit rock bottom.

Rock Bottom

So you would think getting a fancy job at one of the largest health care companies would stop the debt spiral, right? No. So instead of batting down the “cost of living” hatches and paying off my debts, I increased my standard of living, hence plunging me into more debt. To be honest, I wasn’t one of those debtors that buy huge expensive items. I was the most dangerous kind. I’m was what you call the “here and there” credit card user. I just used to it here and there for things I really didn’t need. My expenses, (car note, insurance, rent, etc) at the time were pretty manageable but it was the other “here and there” type of expenses that was doing me in. To be honest I can’t even remember half the stuff I bought, but by the time I was ready to move back in NY in 2000, I had less saved in my bank account than what I had saved in high school with over 12K in credit card debt. I couldn’t believe it. No only did I not have anything saved for a “rainy day”, but even a puddle of water could wipe me out. Although I was “cash poor”, I did have money in my retirement investments, but relative to how much I was making, it was a sad state of affairs.

So I moved back home and spent a couple years rebuilding my savings and getting back on track. Started reading tons of books on savings, investing, managing debt, and got so good at it, I could actually start giving advice to other people. My debt situation was self-inflicted. Through all the years I had a credit card, I never had any financial emergency where I had to wipe my savings out and go to my credit cards. I was living a way of life that I could not afford. I wasn’t living withing my means, and my debt was getting so overwhelming that every dollar I had was going to my debts. I’m happy to say I don’t have any credit card debt.

Conclusion

Every person’s debt story is different, but if there is one area that we need to be mindful of, is our psychology towards money. All the “getting rid of debt” guidelines in the world won’t mean anything, if you don’t have a hold on your desires, behavior, and a understanding of how you view material objects and self. In addition, many of us need to up our financial literacy. I’ve heard of people who literally did not know that they had to pay the debt back on their credit cards. They just thought is was free money. Nor did they know what compounding interest, debt-to-equity ratio, or what a FICO score is. If you don’t know what these things are, then you should not have a credit card.

Not only was my debt burden financially debilitating, but it also took away my freedom of mobility. It was like carrying around a ton of bricks on my back with fetters on my legs. Just think about all the opportunities that you miss out on. At the time, I couldn’t give as much to charity, help family when needed, not to mention I did not have money around if an emergency happened, and could not re-invest any resources in myself/career or even other entrepreneurial endeavors. However you look at it, it’s a Road to Serfdom, and if I can help it (Inshallah), I hope to never experience that type of slavery again. Man, 1st Financial Bank got me good, but it was one of the most important lessons of financial wherewithal and debt management that I have ever experienced.

Before I bring this post to a close, I’ll leave you with two very significant quotes from Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable that should heighten your awareness on some of the very dangerous psychological ideologies that many times, have led us to stray into making poor financial decisions. One is “Cheap Signaling and the other is the “Prediction error”.

Cheap Signaling, pg 6

There were some obvious benefits in showing one’s ability to act on one’s opinions, and not compromising an inch to avoid “offending” or bothering others. I was in a state of rage and didn’t care what my parents (and grandfather) thought of me. This made them quite scared of me, so I could not afford to back down, or even blink. Had I concealed my participation in the riot (as many friends did) and been discovered, instead of being openly defiant, I am certain that I would have been treated as a black sheep. It is one thing to be cosmetically defiant of authority by wearing unconventional clothes—what social scientists and economists call “cheap signaling”—and another to prove willingness to translate belief into action.

Prediction error, pg 194-195

I searched the literature of cognitive science for any research on “future blindness” and found nothing. But in literature on happiness I did find an examination of our chronic errors in prediction that will make us happy.

This prediction error works as follows. You are about to buy a new car. It is going to change your life, elevate your status, and make your commute a vacation. It is so quiet that you can hardly tell if the engine is on, so you can listen to Rachimanioff’s nocturnes on the highway. This new car will bring you to a permanently elevated plateau of contentment. People will think, he has a great car, every time they see you. Yet you forget the last time you bought a car, you also had the same expectations. You do not anticipate that the effect of the new car will eventually wane and that you will revert to the initial condition, as you did last time. A few weeks after you drive you new car out of the showroom, it will become dull. If you had expected this, you probably would not have bought it.

You are about to commit a prediction error that you have already made. Yet it would cost so little to introspect!

Articles that will scare you into saving money

• The Collapse of Personal Savings Rate in America
  http://www.billshrink.com/blog/personal-savings-rate/
• Why do so many NFL players go bankrupt?
  http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Why-do-so-many-NFL-players-go-bankrupt-?urn=nfl,190555
• Income Inequality Is At An All-Time High
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/14/income-inequality-is-at-a_n_259516.html
• Winning Lotto numbers not always the ticket to dreams, success
  http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/oct/01/winning-lotto-numbers-not-always-ticket-dreams-suc/

WIHTJ fans, sorry it took me so long to write Part II of Economics Made Simple. The series covers the following topics:

1. Part I: Renting vs Buying a home
2. Part II: Why Can’t I Make Ends Meet?
   (How I found the Austrian School of Economics)
3. Part III: Saving Money vs Serfdom
4. Part IV: Casino Capitalism

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. The Austrians and Mises
3. John Maynard Keynes
4. Conclusion
5. Economic Resources that will increase your Financial Neurons

After completing the first version of this blog post, I decided to send it to my good friend of mine John Papola, who does the blog But What the Hell do I Know I wanted some honest feed back on my Keynesian vs Austrian School post. In so many nice and friendly words he was able to tell me…well..it sucked. Every now and then it’s good to eat some humble pie. So I did (that pie was pretty good), and I went back to the drawing board. Keep in mind that I consider my boy JP quite a seasoned economist, albeit unofficial, when it comes to the Keynesian Economics and Austrian School comparison, so I knew I had to go back to the drawing board.

In the first version, I tried to make a case for which economic school is a better approach (which I failed at) or attempt at framing what each school is (which I failed to do) or not distort what the Austrian or Keynesian school is (which I mistakenly did). Unfortunately I lost track of what I really wanted to do. I will forgo the Herculean tasks of comparing each school and explain how I found the Austrian School of Economics. What I really wanted to do was frame the following rhetorical and general questions:

• Hey, did you know that there is this economic school of thought that was driven by John Maynard Keynes, and this same school of thought dominates a lot of economic policy in the United States of America?
• In addition, did you know that the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) dominates economic policy in the United States of America? Do you know what the Federal Reserve Bank does?
• Why do we have financial crises and what is the root of how they get started, what caused them, and what can fix them?
• Did you know that there is a school of economic thought called the Austrian School of Economics, that trying to offer a model that explains how the economic world works around us. They understand that it is impossible to control every single move in the economy because it is a dynamic amoeba-like entity that has way too many variables to control?
• Are you aware that to understand this economic mess that it will take more than reading this short blog, but months and months, if not years of grueling eye-busting reading of economic books, articles, podcasts, etc.
• Are you aware that you are about to stop reading this blog post, because of what I said in the previous bullet?
• Are you aware that making the sacrifice to acquire this knowledge will probably make you more informed about why U.S. economic policy is the way that it is and how it’s run it like a bunch of blind orangutans on crystal meth?
• Do you want to understand what true Healthcare reform means?
• Is it important for you to understand the true pros and cons of government policy decisions in the United Sates of America?

Now that you know the precursor, lets give it another go….

Introduction

I was probably hit by the “financial education” bug when I started cleaning up my debt situation around 2000. I’ve been waving the “Hey Folks, America’s household debt is unsustainable” flag for more than 10 years. I never knew what the source of the problem was, but watching the debt-to-asset ratio skyrocket, while concurrently seeing the personal savings rate plummet was not a sign of good times to come. To be honest, I had no idea what was in store for the U.S Economy 8 years later. I just felt that this is not a good situation. An eye opener for me was two things. The stock market bubble of 2000 and last years financial collapse in October of 2008.

I played around in the stock market for several years. (Buying individual stocks and indexes) By following a true value investing/contrarian approach I was able to do pretty well. By adhering to those principles of investing prudence, raking across the 8-K and the 10-K while taking into account the intrinsic value of a companies stock, I was able to avoid a lot of the pitfalls that lured people into the “speculation” stock market bubble of 2000. Yes I made mistakes, but not deal breakers. I never cared whether we were in a bear or bull market. Bear and Bull markets do and don’t matter. (It depends on the situation). Stock market bubbles get headlines, but it’s the diligent investor who spends time understanding what he or she is investing in who wins in the end. This type of effort takes time and patience, which is why most people will invest in whatever is coming from the “water cooler”

After 2000 I didn’t get into anything more than just personal finance. Around 2007 to 2008, the calamity started with Bear Sterns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, the housing market bubble, billion dollar bailouts for banks, investment houses, etc, and thats when it all started. Before these events, I was not aware of how tightly wound the FED was around the U.S. government. At the time I was only aware of the FED moving the fed funds rate up and down to allegedly “cool” or “heat up” the economy. I didn’t know the history of the FED, when the FED was started, not to mention what type of batting average the FED had in stabilizing the economy. I grew some “Rothbardian” legs, if you will, and the rest is history.

Mises and the Austrians

My first entrance into understanding the tip of “Austrian Economic” iceberg was a site called Mises.org. If the Austrian School of Economics was a trunk of a tree, this would be one of many branches off the trunk. For the sake of not making the same mistake twice, I’m going to leave it to you to go to mises.org and assess whether the information is useful or not. They have a wonderful blog called Mises Daily and it’s chock full of morsels of econ delights that will whet your appetite for more economic information.

Lets be honest. Even at the introductory level, this is pretty heavy stuff, but that shouldn’t deter you. I do believe that one of the reasons why Americans are in the fog of economic war when it comes to U.S economic policy is they don’t understand the “whys” of a particular policy decision. Nor do we know where to go to get that information. If you go to the FED website, and click on one of their documents you would need a phd in economics to understand what they are talking about. Oh..and you don’t need a Phd in economics to understand economics. Have the “ivory tower” economists had no idea that this crisis was on our heels and many dismissed the warning signs. Not to completely dismiss the high academic economic trade, but don’t let fancy three letter acronym’d individuals scare you into believing that only THEY know what’s happening in the economy. Too many of them have no idea. We often fall back on our ideological partisan heels, without trying to truly understand the merits and consequences of certain policy decisions. Should we have a minimum wage tax? What are the impacts of having a central bank that dials the economy up and down at will? What is the true impact of the Cash for Clunkers initiative on the economy? What was the involvement of the FED with past and present financial crises? What are the economic solutions available for bringing countries out of poverty and what examples do we have of countries that have already achieved this?

I could go on and on, but these are just a sample of questions about the things that impact our day-to-day lives. Now check out the latest Google Trends. Do you see any broad searches like “Federal Reserve Bank’, “Keynesian Economics”, “Austrian Business Cycle Theory” etc? These are three very powerful terms that you should familiarize yourself with, yet they never ever enter into our stratosphere of topics. Are we surprised that the FED can swoop in and not have any idea where 9 trillion dollars went while Americans are more concerned about fictitious “death panels” in healthcare or whether the Obama earned the right to get the Nobel Peace Prize? We have bigger fish to fry, check out this shocker:

John Maynard Keynes

The first time I heard about anything related to Keynes was through mises.org. I had no intentions of investigating the ideologies of Keynes, but many of the ideologies from Keynes have weaved themselves into the current economic policy of the United States of America. I wanted to get at the heart of what inspires the U.S. government to do what they do. I’ll provide resources at the end of this blog post that will get you up to speed on who Keynes is and how his ideologies have influenced U.S. economic policy. There is a lot of history there, and it will take you a while to churn through all the books, articles, and videos about Keynes. Here is a good start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics (Keynesians Economics).

Clearly Keynesian economics has made a huge comeback in recent years due to the current collapse of the economy. Are We All Keynesians Now?. I wonder what Keynes would say if he saw this current crisis? I’m sure Paul Krugman would be delighted. Keynes most famous work is the The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. This is what what put Keynes on the map.

Conclusion

This post is about awareness. I have come to realize that having a surface understanding of U.S. economic policy has not served me, or anyone else well. Especially those who consider themselves poor, downtrodden or apathetic about the political process. How are we to make educated decisions about government policy if we don’t understand what it is and how it works? How are we to support bills that are created in the house and senate if we don’t understand what is being passed into law? I felt I had a lackluster understanding of certain presidential candidates, U.S. tax policy, U.S economic policy choices, local state regulations, etc which prompted me to get serious about researching these same items. As a matter of fact, this is more important than what your party affiliation is. This is not a left or right wing post. This is not a pro free-market or pro socialism post. This is a post about making informed decisions and holding our government accountable, including ourselves. Regardless of whether you consider yourself someone on the left, conservative, right, republican, democrat, independent, rich, poor, middle-class, wealthy, religious, atheist, deprived, a victim, a power broker, keynesian, austrian, communist, libertarian, socialist, indifferent, etc, you should consider what I just wrote in this post. Being a blind ideologue is easy, but spending the time to understand things properly is more difficult. Too many people choose the former instead of the latter. Two things to remember, there is no such thing as a free lunch and a government is only as good as the people who support it.

Books

• Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt
• The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money by John Maynard Keynes
• Road to Serfdom by F.A. Hayek
• Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith
• The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 by Paul Krugman
• America’s Great Depression by Murray N. Rothbard
• Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse by Thomas E. Woods Jr. and Ron Paul